The Imago Dei Cannot Be Rewritten: Why Conversion Therapy is Spiritual Violence
- Christopher Schouten
- Mar 31
- 4 min read
The landscape of religious freedom and child safety shifted significantly with the recent Supreme Court decision affirming conversion therapy. While many advocates for LGBTQ+ youth hoped for a definitive end to these practices, the legal conversation has taken a troubling turn. When courts suggest that banning conversion therapy—a practice rejected by every major medical and mental health organization—might violate "free speech," they inadvertently (or not) create a loophole for spiritual violence to continue under the guise of religious expression.

As progressive Christians, we must confront this reality head-on. If the law fails to provide a shield for the vulnerable, the Church’s theological mandate to protect becomes even more urgent. We must name conversion therapy for what it is: a rejection of God’s creative intent and a violation of the sacredness of the human soul.
The Theological Error of "Correcting" God
The drive behind conversion therapy is often rooted in a theology of "brokenness"—the idea that a person’s sexual orientation is a defect to be repaired. This perspective is not just psychologically damaging; it is a fundamental misunderstanding of the Imago Dei.
In Genesis 1:27, we are told, "So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them." A progressive understanding of this text recognizes that "male and female" functions like "day and night"—it describes the poles of a vast and beautiful spectrum created by God. To tell a child that their inherent orientation is a mistake is to tell the Creator that their handiwork is flawed.
When we attempt to force a change in someone's orientation, we are practicing a form of theological "gaslighting." We are asking individuals to deny the very truth of how they were "knit together" in the womb (Psalm 139:13). This is not "counseling" - it is an attempt to rewrite a Divine script based on a narrow, exclusionary interpretation of holiness.
The "Fruit" of Spiritual Violence
Jesus provided a clear metric for evaluating any teaching: "By their fruit you will recognize them" (Matthew 7:16).
The "fruit" of conversion therapy is a harvest of trauma. It produces:
Shame: Teaching children that their capacity to love is an abomination.
Isolation: Severing the bond between a believer and their faith community.
Despair: Leading to significantly higher rates of depression and suicidality.
When religious speech is used to inflict this kind of psychological and spiritual wound, it ceases to be "Good News." It becomes a "heavy burden" of the kind Jesus condemned the religious leaders of his day for imposing (Matthew 23:4). To defend this practice as "free speech" ignores the reality that for the child on the receiving end, this speech functions as a weapon and does tangible and real harm. One must only look at the suicide rates of LGBTQIA+ youth to see the impact of this way of thinking.
Reclaiming a Theology of Affirmation
The recent legal discourse, as noted in the AP report regarding the scrutiny of bans on conversion therapy, highlights a dangerous intersection where "religious liberty" is used to justify harm. However, our faith tells us that "the whole law is fulfilled in keeping this one command: 'Love your neighbor as yourself'" (Galatians 5:14).
True religious freedom is not the freedom to traumatize children; it is the freedom to live out a faith that reflects God’s unconditional love.
Diversity as Design: We see God’s love for diversity throughout Scripture, from the various creatures of the sea to the inclusion of the Ethiopian Eunuch in Acts 8, where Philip affirms that nothing—not identity, nor status—stands in the way of God's grace.
The Law of Love: If a practice leads to the destruction of a person's spirit, it cannot be of God. Our theology must prioritize the physical and emotional safety of the "least of these."
A Call to the Church
If the legal system remains hesitant to ban these practices due to free speech concerns, the Church must be even louder in its condemnation. We cannot hide behind "sincerely held beliefs" to justify the spiritual equivalent of child abuse.
We must build communities where:
Identity is Celebrated: Where being LGBTQ+ is seen as a unique way to reflect the glory of God.
Safety is Sacred: Where we prioritize the mental health of our youth over dogmatic rigidity.
Theology is Healing: Where the Gospel is used to bind up wounds, not create them.
Trying to change who God meant someone to be is not an act of faith - it is an act of hubris. It is an attempt to play God rather than serve God. As we move forward, let our "speech" be defined by the grace found in 1 John 4:18: "There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment."
Conversion therapy is a theology of fear and punishment. Our task is to replace it with a theology of perfect, affirming, and protective love.



Comments